King's College London
Browse

File(s) under embargo

Reason: The Department of Health and Social Care own the data, so they cannot be made available to anyone without their permission.

The impact of “freedom day” on COVID-19 health protective behaviour in England: An observational study of hand hygiene, face covering use and physical distancing in public spaces pre and post the relaxing of restrictions

dataset
posted on 2024-01-24, 17:05 authored by Louise SmithLouise Smith, James RubinJames Rubin

Objectives: To study the prevalence of COVID-19 health protective behaviours before and after rules eased in England on the 19th July 2021.

Design: Observational study pre (12th-18th July) and post (26th July-1st August) 19th July, and a cross-sectional online survey (26th to 27th July).

Setting: Observations occurred in supermarkets (n = 10), train stations (n = 10), bus stops (n = 10), a coach station (n = 1) and a London Underground station (n = 1). The survey recruited a nationally representative sample.

Participants: All adults entering the observed locations during a one-hour period (n = 3819 pre- and n = 2948 post-19th July). In the online survey, 1472 respondents reported having been shopping for groceries/visited a pharmacy and 566 reported having used public transport or having been in a taxi/minicab in the last week.

Main outcome measures: We observed whether people wore a face covering, maintained distance from others and cleaned their hands. We investigated self-reports of wearing a face covering while in shops or using public transport.

Results: In most locations observed, the proportion of people wearing face coverings, cleaning the hands and maintaining physical distance declined post 19th July. Pre 19th July, 70.2% (95% CI 68.7 to 71.7%) of people were observed to be wearing a face covering versus 55.8% (54.2 to 57.9%) post 19th July. Equivalent rates for physical distancing were 40.9% (39.0 to 42.8%) versus 29.5% (27.4 to 31.7%), and for hand hygiene were 4.4% (3.8 to 5.1%) versus 3.9% (3.2 to 4.6%). Self-reports of “always” wearing face coverings were broadly similar to observed rates.

Conclusions: Adherence to protective behaviours was sub-optimal and declined during the relaxation of restrictions, despite appeals to exercise caution. Self-reports of “always” wearing a face covering in specific locations appear valid.

Funding

Evaluating and improving communication with the public during a pandemic, using rapid turn around telephone surveys

NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre

Find out more...

Department of Health and Social Care

NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response

History

Geospatial coverage

England

Data collection from date

2021/07/12

Data collection to date

2021/08/01

Collection method

Observational study. Team members observed behaviour at 32 locations during two data collection periods (12-18 July 2021, and 26 July-1 August 2021), spending 1 hour in each location observing and logging behaviour. This study was approved by the King's College London BDM Research Ethics Subcommittee (reference: HR-20/21-21752). Online survey. Participants were eligible to take part if they lived in the UK and were aged 16 years or older. Participants were recruited from two specialist research panel providers (Respondi, n=50,000; Savanta, n=31,500) using quota sampling (age and gender combined, and region). These are people who have signed up to take part in online surveys. Consent was implied by participants’ completion of the survey, as is the industry standard. Data were collected in line with the terms and conditions that people agreed to when signing up to be a member of the research panel.

Usage metrics

    Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC